Electrostatic Tester Comparison: Finding the Right Tool for Your Needs

2025-11-12 15:19:07

Comparison of Static Electricity Testers: How to Choose the Right Tool for Your Needs

To select a static electricity tester that fits your requirements, first compare mainstream types based on core dimensions, then filter according to practical needs such as measurement objects, scenarios, accuracy, and budget. Below is a detailed comparison and selection method:

1. Core Dimension Comparison of Mainstream Static Electricity Testers

Static electricity testers are usually divided into contact-type and non-contact-type by measurement method, along with specialized models for specific scenarios. Different types vary significantly in performance and applicable scenarios, with specific comparisons as follows:

2. Practical Steps for Precise Selection Based on Needs

1. First determine the measurement object and core parameters: For sensitive precision components such as ICs and wafers, prioritize contact-type testers to avoid discharge damage during measurement. For large non-sensitive objects such as clothing and carpets, a non-contact-type Electrostatic field tester is sufficient. Meanwhile, check the measurement range: 20-60KV is enough for ordinary production scenarios, while high-voltage scenarios such as large industrial equipment require professional models with a 200KV range like FRASER 715.

2. Match usage environment and operational requirements: For explosion-proof environments such as chemical plants, must choose explosion-proof testers like EX715. For narrow spaces, select models with external probes such as Kleinwachter EFM-115-MK11. If test data needs to be aggregated, analyzed, and converted into audit reports, choose models with USB or Bluetooth interfaces (e.g., DESCO SCS770715) that support PC connection and PDF report export, complying with relevant ISO standards.

3. Balance selection with accuracy and budget: For daily inspections in ordinary workshops, domestic models with approximately 10% accuracy are cost-effective. For fields with high precision requirements such as semiconductors and military electronics, import models with accuracy < 5% (e.g., DESCO, FRASER) are preferred. In addition, domestic models are affordable for regular scenarios with limited budgets, while import models, though more expensive, offer better anti-interference performance and stability for core production links with high requirements.

4. Refer to industry standards for final verification: The electronics industry needs to comply with IEC 61000-4-2, and the automotive industry follows ISO 10605. When selecting a tester, confirm that its parameters meet the corresponding industry standards to avoid unrecognized test results. For example, when choosing equipment for electronic factories, verify compatibility with Human Body Model (HBM) and Machine Model (MM) testing requirements.